Skip to Main Content
 

Soybean Management Practice Effects on Yield

Categories: PLANTING, SOYBEANS
Share:
  • Yield response to management practice is location dependent.

  • Crop monitoring is key to manage for potential yield-limiting factors.

  • A foliar-applied fungicide at R3 was the management practice that provided the most consistent response across all locations.

Line graph showing historical average soybean grain yield from 1960 to 2022.
Graph 1. Historical U.S average soybean grain yield
Source: USDA-NASS1

The U.S. average soybean grain yield has continued to increase over the decades. In 1960, the average soybean grain yield was 24 bu/A and in 2020, it was 51 bu/A (Graph 1). Advancements in soybean genetics is the primary factor for the historical yield increases, however, improvements in crop management have also contributed to increasing soybean yields. Enhanced fertility, foliar protection, earlier planting, biologicals and precision agriculture are just some of the management practices farmers can consider when growing soybeans.

Justus von Liebig famously popularized the law of the minimum which states that plant growth and yield is dictated not by total resources available, but rather by the scarcest resource or limiting factor. For instance, to apply this concept to agriculture, applying more of 1 nutrient will not increase yield if another nutrient is deficient and impeding plant growth. The law of the minimum applies to not only soil nutrients, but also water availability, pest control, solar radiation and many other factors that contribute to crop growth and yield.

Increasing soybean yields requires a systematic approach to management. Getting the plant off to a strong start sets up high yield potential early in the growing season and sustaining plant health through crop maturity helps maintain that yield potential.

Management Approach

Golden Harvest® Agronomy in Action research trials were implemented at 9 locations across the Midwest to evaluate the effect of different management practices on soybean grain yield. The trials were designed as an additive or “stair-step” approach, starting with the farmer’s normal fertility program planted at 140K seeds/A as the standard. Each management factor listed below is an addition to the previous factor. The list and order of the management practices included:

  1. Farmer Standard
    Farmer’s normal fertility program with no additional
    inputs planted at 140K seeds/A

  2. + Fertility
    Planter-applied 2x2x2 placement of 14 N, 44 P2O5, 57
    K2O, and 3 S (lbs. of nutrient/A)

  3. + Fungicide
    Foliar application of Miravis® Neo fungicide (13.7 oz/A) at R3

  4. + Insecticide
    Foliar application of Endigo® ZC insecticide (3.8 oz/A) at R3

  5. + Biological
    Foliar application of YieldOn (1.5 pt/A) at R3

  6. + Nitrogen
    Broadcast Agrotain®–coated urea (90 lbs. of N/A) at R3

  7. + Foliar Micros
    Foliar application of MAX–IN Ultra ZMB (2 qt./A) at R3

  8. + Population
    180K seeds/A

2 varieties were grown at each location. Either GH2041X and GH2329X, GH2788X and GH3088X, or GH3475X and GH3546X Golden Harvest soybean varieties were planted depending on the geography. There was no interaction between management factor and variety at any location, so all results are averaged across locations.

Yield Response to Management Practices

The average soybean yield at all locations was 70+ bu/A except for Bridgewater, SD, which experienced drought conditions throughout most of the growing season. Not surprisingly, yield responses to each management practice varied across locations. The management factor providing the largest yield response at each location is highlighted in orange in Table 1. On average across all locations, management practices had a significant effect on grain yield (Table 1).

Data table comparing soybean yield by treatment management and location
Table 1. Change in yield with the addition of each factor to the previous management system. Orange highlights the management practice that provided the largest positive yield response for each given location.

Application of a foliar fungicide provided the most consistent yield response of all inputs, ranging from 2.0 to 5.9 bu/A, depending on the location. Averaged across locations, foliar fungicide applications at R3 significantly increased yield by 3.7 bu/A. Increases in yield from foliar fungicide applications appear to be due to an increased number of seeds produced (Table 2). None of the other management practices resulted in an increase in seed number as seen with fungicide applications. Although fungicide did not increase seed weight, it likely helped maintain it.

Close up of bean leaf beetles feeding on soybean plant in Clinton, IL.”
Figure 1. Bean leaf beetle feeding at Clinton, IL

Response to other management practices was much less consistent but significantly improved yields when specific yield-limiting factors such as insect pressure or soil nutrient deficiencies were present at a given location. For instance, the sandy loam soil with 1.7% organic matter and a cation exchange capacity of 7.0 meq/100g at the Geneseo, IL, site likely made P2O5 and K2O applied through the planter more available to plants, resulting in a 5.1 bu/A increase in yield over the farmer’s standard fertility program. Small amounts of sulfur (S) applied likely also contributed to the fertilizer response, as Geneseo had lower soil S levels. Japanese beetle and late-season bean leaf beetle feeding likely resulted in the 2.5 bu/A R3 insecticide application response at Clinton, IL (Figure 1).

Close up of leaf burning on soybean plant in Clinton, IL
Figure 2. Leaf burning from broadcast urea at the R3 growth stage at Clinton, IL

Smaller and less consistent responses from foliar-applied micronutrients and biologicals were observed although not correlated with any specific yield-limiting factor. Increasing soybean seeding rates did not show a yield response when averaged across locations, and it was 1 of 2 management practices that never returned the largest yield improvement for a specific location. Broadcasting Agrotain-coated urea at R3 resulted in leaf burning at most locations and likely reduced yields in some cases (Figure 2).

Manage for the Location

The results from this study demonstrate that management practices need to be adjusted depending on the location. Locations with low soil fertility levels or soils that do not have the ability to hold available nutrients should benefit from fertilizer applied near the seed or from foliar-applied micronutrient. Insecticide should be applied when insect thresholds are met to reduce crop damage. A fungicide application was the management practice that provided the most consistent yield response across all locations. Continued crop monitoring is the key to identifying potential yield-limiting factors and to making management decisions to mitigate yield loss.

References:
1 USDA - National Agricultural Statistical Service (USDA-NASS). 2021. Soybeans. Grain Yield. United States, 1960 to date. USDA-NASS, Washington, DC.

All photos are either the property of Syngenta or used with permission.

Syngenta hereby disclaims any liability for Third Party websites referenced herein.

Performance assessments are based upon results or analysis of public information, field observations and/or internal Syngenta evaluations.

Product performance assumes disease presence.

© 2022 Syngenta. Important: Always read and follow label instructions. Some products may not be registered for sale or use in all states or counties. Please check with your local extension service to ensure registration status. AAtrex 4L, AAtrex Nine-O, Acuron, Agri-Flex, Agri-Mek 0.15EC, Agri-Mek SC, Avicta 500FS, Avicta Complete Beans 500, Avicta Complete Corn 250, Avicta Duo Corn, Avicta Duo 250 Corn, Avicta Duo COT202, Avicta Duo Cotton, Besiege, Bicep II Magnum, Bicep II Magnum FC, Bicep Lite II Magnum, Callisto Xtra, Cyclone SL 2.0, Denim, Endigo ZC, Endigo ZCX, Epi-Mek 0.15EC, Expert, Force, Force 3G, Force CS, Force 6.5G, Force Evo, Gramoxone SL, Gramoxone SL 2.0, Gramoxone SL 3.0, Karate, Karate with Zeon Technology, Lamcap, Lamcap II, Lamdec, Lexar EZ, Lumax EZ, Medal II ATZ, Minecto Pro, Proclaim, Tavium Plus VaporGrip Technology, Voliam Xpress and Warrior II with Zeon Technology are Restricted Use Pesticides.

Some seed treatment offers are separately registered products applied to the seed as a combined slurry. Always read individual product labels and treater instructions before combining and applying component products.

Orondis Gold may be sold as a formulated premix or as a combination of separately registered products: Orondis Gold 200 and Orondis Gold.

Important: Always read and follow label and bag tag instructions; only those labeled as tolerant to glufosinate may be sprayed with glufosinate ammonium-based herbicides. LibertyLink®, Liberty® and the Water Droplet logo are registered trademarks of BASF. HERCULEX® and the HERCULEX Shield are trademarks of Corteva Agriscience LLC. HERCULEX Insect Protection technology by Corteva Agriscience LLC. Under federal and local laws, only dicamba-containing herbicides registered for use on dicamba-tolerant varieties may be applied. See product labels for details and tank mix partners. Golden Harvest® and NK® soybean varieties are protected under granted or pending U.S. variety patents and other intellectual property rights, regardless of the trait(s) within the seed. The Enlist E3® soybean, LibertyLink®, LibertyLink® GT27®, Roundup Ready 2 Xtend®, Roundup Ready 2 Yield® and XtendFlex® soybean traits may be protected under numerous United States patents. It is unlawful to save soybeans containing these traits for planting or transfer to others for use as a planting seed. Only dicamba formulations that employ VaporGrip® Technology are approved for use with Roundup Ready 2 Xtend® and XtendFlex® soybeans. Only 2,4-D choline formulations with Colex-D® Technology are approved for use with Enlist E3® soybeans. The trademarks or service marks displayed or otherwise used herein are the property of a Syngenta Group Company. ENLIST E3® soybean technology is jointly developed with Corteva Agriscience LLC and M.S. Technologies, L.L.C. The ENLIST trait and ENLIST Weed Control System are technologies owned and developed by Corteva Agriscience LLC. ENLIST® and ENLIST E3® are trademarks of Corteva Agriscience LLC. GT27® is a trademark of M.S. Technologies, L.L.C. and BASF. Roundup Ready 2 Xtend®, Roundup Ready 2 Yield®, XtendFlex®, VaporGrip® and YieldGard VT Pro® are registered trademarks used under license from the Bayer Group. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. More information about Agrisure Duracade® is available at http://www.biotradestatus.com/.

Contact a local seed advisor

X

You are viewing from

Thank you for visiting the Golden Harvest website. We understand how important it is for you to find agronomic and product information pertinent to your local area. Please enter your zip code or select your area below to ensure you are seeing the information that matters most to you.
Learn more about regions >

CHANGE BY ZIP CODE OR SELECT YOUR REGION

OR
We’re sorry. Golden Harvest is not available in this area. Please try another zip code or contact a Golden Harvest Seed Advisor for more information.

Is this page helpful to you?

How can we improve
this page? (optional)

Can you tell us your
role in agriculture? (optional)

Thanks for the feedback.

We appreciate your participation