Skip to Main Content

Managing Tar Spot with a Combination of Genetics and Fungicide

Categories: GROWING, CORN
  • Tar spot is a relatively new disease in the U.S., but it has already spread throughout the Corn Belt and become an established pathogen.
  • Hybrid susceptibility or tolerance to tar spot is the key factor in yield loss potential after tar spot infects a corn field.
  • Dialing in the timing of fungicide application(s) is critical to tar spot management.

Tar spot of corn is a relatively new disease to the U.S. It was first reported in northwest Indiana and north-central Illinois in 2015. Prior to 2015, tar spot only occurred in Mexico, Central America and northern parts of South America in cooler, high elevation environments. In 2018, this disease caused significant yield loss in a multi-state outbreak and has spread as far west as Nebraska and as far south as Georgia and Florida. Tar spot was identified in both Kansas and Iowa in June of 2024, many weeks earlier than previous years (Figure 1). Monitor fields closely to determine if early management is needed.

Map showing which counties in several states have or previously had tar spot outbreaks in corn fields. Figure 1. Counties confirmed with tar spot incidence (Corn ipmPIPE 6/10/24).

Fungal Pathogen Responsible

Tar spot observed in the United States is caused by a fungus referred to as Phyllachora maydis.1 In Latin America where P. maydis was first observed, it has been known to form a complex with a secondary fungal pathogen, Monographella maydis. The combination of the two fungi are referred to as tar spot complex and known to cause more severe yield loss when both pathogens are present.2 Monographella maydis and its association with P. maydis has not yet been observed in North America, although significant yield loss is frequently observed.


Close-up of the fungus Phyllachora maydis, which causes tar spot on corn. Figure 2. Phyllachora maydis, the fungus causing tar spot, with and without lesions forming around stromata.
  • Tar spot can be identified by raised black, irregular-shaped fungal structures (Figure 2) called stromata, which appear as specks of tar splattered onto the leaf surface.
  • Lesions have a bumpy feel that is not easily rubbed off.
  • Spots can be surrounded by a small, tan halo giving a “fish-eye” appearance.
  • The disease begins on the lower corn leaves and moves to the upper plant and ear husks.
  • Tar spot is found on both healthy and dead plant tissue on upper and lower surfaces of leaves.
  • Often confused with:
    1. Common and southern rust late in season as they switch from producing orange-red spores (urediniospores) to black spores (teliospores). However, rust pustules may easily be scraped from the leaf.
    2. Saprophytic organisms that break down dead plant tissue late in season, however they will not exhibit a bumpy texture.
  • Laboratory diagnosis may be required to correctly diagnose the disease.


The repeated occurrence of tar spot in the Midwest indicates it is well adapted to overwintering on soil and residue. Tar spot development and infection is highly dependent on extended periods of cool nighttime temperatures, often observed when average night-day temperatures reduce to 60-70°F.

Tar Spot infection and symptom influence on corn yield loss timeline Figure 3. Tar spot infection/symptom timeline.

Infection is also highly dependent on having extended periods of leaf wetness resulting from high overnight humidity levels. Infection can occur at any stage of crop development if inoculum is present and favorable environmental conditions exist. After infection it can take 14-21 days before tar spot lesions begin to appear. Symptoms generally start on lower leaves and rapidly move up the plant if favorable environmental conditions persist. Typical hot and dry July weather patterns delay tar spot infections until later in the growing season. However, tar spot can develop earlier in the season, resulting in severe loss of leaf area, reducing yield potential and standability. Late season disease development, occurring just prior to or at crop maturity, is more frequently observed and depends on the infection timing, so it may have minimal impact on yield.

Part of what makes potential tar spot a challenging disease is that it is polycyclic, meaning that within a 21-day period it can complete a growth cycle and form new spores that can spread and cause secondary infections. Spores move by wind and plant residue that can be carried by field equipment to other fields.

Five Key Factors Drive Yield Loss Potential

  1. Hybrid tolerance to tar spot
  2. Presence and quantity of inoculum in a field
  3. Environmental conditions for infection and spread
  4. Growth stage of corn when it is infected and when lesions form
  5. Effectiveness of management practices

The timing of tar spot infection is a driver in yield loss potential from this disease. Temperature and moisture influence when the infection from present inoculum begins. The later in the season that infection occurs, the less yield loss potential. Since tar spot is polycyclic and can produce new spores in overlapping cycles, the disease pressure can grow and spread rapidly.

Management Practices

Due to the newness of this disease in the United States, best management practices are still being developed. Employing multiple management practices are critical for dealing with tar spot.

  1. Hybrid Selection

    Hybrids differ in susceptibility to tar spot infection, making hybrid selection one of the first tools for managing this disease. Hybrid differences observed in Table 1 can be used in hybrid placement decisions for fields with known history of tar spot.
  2. Crop Rotation and Tillage:

    Burying residue with tillage and rotating crops to avoid exposure of overwintering pathogens is a common cultural practice used to manage many diseases. Recent research on tar spot has shown small reductions in disease severity from using these cultural practices. The ability of tar spot spores to spread within the growing season is likely minimizing most benefits of using rotation or tillage. Rotation and tillage may help in some situations but are likely not effective enough to use as a standalone management practice.
  3. Fungicide Application:

    Early fungicide applications at or before first signs of development have been effective at reducing tar spot in previous trials.3 However, infection often occurs weeks before symptoms, making timing of preventative fungicide applications challenging. Late-season curative applications of fungicides are typically not affective. Scouting, along with using the Tarspotter app to understand when conditions are most conducive for disease development, can help better time spray applications.
    • If conditions are favorable for tar spot development early in the season, an application at V4-V8 corn growth stage and/or the V10-VT growth stage with a registered product could reduce infection within fields confirmed with tar spot in prior years.
    • A second application may be warranted if conditions persist for infection around the VT-R3 growth stage.
    • If any of these exist, a second application could be needed: 1.) susceptible hybrid was planted, 2.) a conducive environment for infection continues, or 3.) the field has a history of significant tar spot.
    • Fully registered Syngenta fungicide options include Trivapro® and Miravis® Neo to manage tar spot.
    • It is important to also consider other disease risks. Potential for other diseases like gray leaf spot, Northern corn leaf blight, Northern corn leaf spot and rust can help simplify decisions to treat fields with a broad-spectrum fungicide that can manage multiple diseases simultaneously.
  4. Other Considerations:

    Observations of reduced tar spot severity in dryland corners of irrigated fields have highlighted the potential influence of irrigation on tar spot development. Current research is further investigating limiting irrigation to daytime hours to determine if that can help minimize disease development.
Table showing corn hybrids rated 1-9 on dealing with Tar Spot disease. Table 1. Golden Harvest Hybrid Tar Spot 1-9 Rating. 1= best 9 = worst

1Crop Protection Network. 2019. Corn Disease Management, Tar Spot, CPN-2012,

2Hock J. J.Kranz, and B.L. Renfro. 1995. Studies on the epidemiology of the tar spot disease complex of maize in Mexico. Plant Path. 44:490-502.

3Bajet, N.B., B.L. Renfro, J.M. Valdez Carrasco. 1994. Control of tar spot of maize and its effect on yield. International J. of Pest Man. 40:121-125.


You are viewing from

Thank you for visiting the Golden Harvest website. We understand how important it is for you to find agronomic and product information pertinent to your local area. Please enter your zip code or select your area below to ensure you are seeing the information that matters most to you.
Learn more about regions >


We’re sorry. Golden Harvest is not available in this area. Please try another zip code or contact a Golden Harvest Seed Advisor for more information.

Is this page helpful to you?

How can we improve
this page? (optional)

Can you tell us your
role in agriculture? (optional)

Thanks for the feedback.

We appreciate your participation